Legal Opinion

Doud v. Huntington Hebrew Congregation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 27, 1917PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Joseph H. Doud, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Suffolk on the 18th day of January, 1917, upon the decision of the court dismissing the complaint on the merits after - a trial before the court without a jury.

1Opinion of the Court

Blackmar, J.:

The judgment might have been affirmed upon the opinion of the learned justice who tried the case, except that the *749appellant urges upon us a point wMch apparently was not presented to the court at Trial Term.

The point on which the present appeal is rested in that the tax of 1901, for non-payment of which the land was sold to defendant’s grantor, was, under the law as it then existed, assessed against the person and not the land; that the assessment was against Eunice Baker; that the land of Emma Baker was sold to satisfy the debt of Eunice Baker, in violation of her constitutional…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Meigs v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Peterson v. . MartinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Bryan v. . McGurkNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Hagner v. HallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  5. People Ex Rel. Boenig v. . HegemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1917

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Dunkum v. MacEck Building Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Kiamesha Development Corp. v. Guild Properties, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. Helterline v. PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
  4. Small v. HullMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  5. In re KantorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API