Legal Opinion
Small v. Hull
Montana Supreme Court
Decided April 14, 1934No. 7,177PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman
This action was brought to quiet title to forty acres of land situated in Glacier county, described as the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of section 13, township 35 north, range 6 west. The complaint is in the usual form.
Yeda G. Hull, and C. E. Frisbee as guardian of the estate of Eugene, Evelyn and Eileen Hull, minors, allege in their answer that they are the owners of the above-described land as heirs of Roy C. Hull, deceased. They allege that plaintiff’s claim to ownership is based upon a tax deed which, they allege, is void for several reasons. Plaintiff by reply pleads that…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Turner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Marx v. HanthornSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Meigs v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Redfield v. ParksSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lowery v. Garfield CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1949
- Tannhauser v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Walker v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Fariss v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1940
- Kerr v. SmallMontana Supreme Court · 1941
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.