Legal Opinion

Shpak v. Oletsky

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 2, 1977No. [No. 161, September Term, 1976.]PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

We shall here hold that the date for determining whether a way of necessity was created by an implied reservation was that of the contract between the original parties and not that of the ultimate deed which came after a period of litigation. Accordingly, we shall hold that appelleescross-appellants, Samuel Oletsky et al., do not have a way of necessity across lands of appellants-cross-appellees, Abraham A, Shpak et al. (Shpak),

1. The Pacts

The facts will be better understood by reference to the plat appended to this opinion which the reporter is directed to reproduce. Wm. H, Smith Company,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Condry v. LaurieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  2. Oliver v. HookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1877
  3. Tong v. FeldmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  4. Greenwalt v. McCardellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
  5. Dalton v. Real Estate & Improvement Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Boucher v. BoyerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  2. Beck v. MangelsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Chevy Chase Land Co. of Montgomery County v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  4. Calvert Joint Venture 140 v. SniderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Pencader Associates, Inc. v. Glasgow TrustSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API