Legal Opinion

Pencader Associates, Inc. v. Glasgow Trust

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided June 8, 1982PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERRMANN, Chief Justice:

Pencader Associates, Inc. (hereinafter Pencader) sought imposition by the Court of Chancery of an easement or way-of-necessity over land owned by Glasgow Trust. Glasgow Trust moved to dismiss, arguing that the Court of Chancery lacked subject matter jurisdiction; it also moved for sanctions against Pencader for failure to comply with the rules of discovery. Both parties moved for summary judgment. The Trial Court denied the motion for sanctions, ruled that it had subject matter jurisdiction, denied Pencader’s motion for summary judgment, and dismissed the action,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Condry v. LaurieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  2. Waubun Beach Ass'n v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Finn v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Klein v. DoveCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  5. Wagner v. FairlambSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Broadhead v. TerpeningMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Scureman v. JudgeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1992
  3. Lake George Park, L.L.C. v. IBM Mid-America Employees Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  4. Burlison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. In re RinehardtSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API