Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Wacksman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 2, 1987PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarvey, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 23, 1986, which ruled that claimant was entitled to receive benefits.
Claimant’s employer alleges that claimant voluntarily left her job without good cause and thus should have been disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits. Whether a claimant voluntaria left employment without good cause is a factual question for the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board and, if supported by substantial evidence, that determination will not be disturbed (Matter of Steed [Roberts], 115 AD2d 166). The relevant factual…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Claim of SteedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- In re the Claim of DenzelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- In re the Claim of PankiewiczAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- In re the Claim of DenzelNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Claim of HellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re the Claim of WigutowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- In re the Claim of BookhardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- In re the Claim of KnoblauchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Claim of LavecchiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999