Legal Opinion
Arthur Palardy v. Canadian Universal Insurance Company, and American Universal Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 18, 1966No. 265, Docket 30163Published
1Opinion of the Court
360 F.2d 1007
Arthur PALARDY, Appellee,
v.
CANADIAN UNIVERSAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, and
American Universal Insurance Company.
No. 265.
Docket 30163.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued March 9, 1966.
Decided May 18, 1966.
Robinson E. Keyes, Rutland, Vt. (Ryan, Smith & Carbine and James T. Haugh, Rutland, Vt., on the brief), for appellant.
Douglas C. Pierson, Burlington, Vt. (Albert W. Coffrin, Burlington, Vt., on the brief), for appellee.
Before SMITH, HAYS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:
1
This is a suit on a judgment which Palardy, the appellee, had…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PedersonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
- Tucker v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United StatesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
- Arthur Palardy v. Canadian Universal Insurance Company, and American Universal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Ohio Farmers Insurance v. HunterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906