Ullery v. FULLETON
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSiddoway, J.
¶1 We are presented in this case with the issue of whether a party whose claim was once dismissed on the basis of a curable standing defect as well as a failure of proof on a substantive element is barred by the doctrine of issue preclusion from curing the standing defect and pursuing the claim in a second action. We conclude that Rod and Dianne Ullery have not demonstrated that dismissal in a prior action of Billy and Alice Fulleton’s breach of contract counterclaim asserted in this action was by a final judgment on the merits or that an identical issue was determined. We therefore reverse…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Bank of New York Mellon v. GeorgCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Trinity Universal Insurance v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Berschauer Phillips Construction Co. v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Durland v. San Juan CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Bunch v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.