Legal Opinion

Ullery v. FULLETON

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 19, 2011No. 28726-2-IIIPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSiddoway, J.

¶1 We are presented in this case with the issue of whether a party whose claim was once dismissed on the basis of a curable standing defect as well as a failure of proof on a substantive element is barred by the doctrine of issue preclusion from curing the standing defect and pursuing the claim in a second action. We conclude that Rod and Dianne Ullery have not demonstrated that dismissal in a prior action of Billy and Alice Fulleton’s breach of contract counterclaim asserted in this action was by a final judgment on the merits or that an identical issue was determined. We therefore reverse…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  5. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Bank of New York Mellon v. GeorgCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  2. Trinity Universal Insurance v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  3. Berschauer Phillips Construction Co. v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. Durland v. San Juan CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  5. Bunch v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API