Legal Opinion

Wojcieszek v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided September 26, 1997No. C.A. 96-30037-MAPPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT

PONSOR, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs subscribe to an inside telephone wire maintenance service (“IWMS”) plan offered by defendants New England Telephone and Telegraph Company and NYNEX Corporation (“NET” and “NYNEX”). This plan covers a telephone subscriber for potential repairs to the telephone lines that run through the dwelling to the phone jack. Until 1986 the defendants had an effective monopoly on these services, for which a customer paid as part of his or her telephone bill.

As of January 1, 1987, the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Live Concert Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
  2. Bepco, Inc. v. Allied-Signal, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2000
  3. Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Boston Scientific Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
  4. Fricke-Parks Press, Inc. v. FangDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API