Fulton, Supt. v. Gardiner
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
The Court of Appeals was correct in indorsing the rule laid down in the case of State, ex rel. Toledo Theatres & Realty Co., v. Fulton, Supt. of Banks, 124 Ohio St., 360, 178 N. E., 585. The whole question here is whether or not plaintiffs below were entitled to a preference over general creditors, upon the statement of facts contained in the pleadings.
The question is between the general depositors of the Ohio Savings Bank &i Trust Company and the defendants in error.
The general depositors in effect claim that the bank in question was merely a collector of rents, and that the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McDonald, Admr. v. FultonOhio Supreme Court · 1932
- State Ex Rel. Toledo Theatres & Realty Co. v. FultonOhio Supreme Court · 1931
3Cited by5 opinions
- Squire v. American Express Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
- Crosley v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1966
- Luper v. Action Industries, Inc. (In re Lee Way Holding Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1990
- Branciforti v. Ninety-Eighth, Realty Co.Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1934
- Crosley v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1966