Legal Opinion

Fulton, Supt. v. Gardiner

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1933No. 24026PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The Court of Appeals was correct in indorsing the rule laid down in the case of State, ex rel. Toledo Theatres & Realty Co., v. Fulton, Supt. of Banks, 124 Ohio St., 360, 178 N. E., 585. The whole question here is whether or not plaintiffs below were entitled to a preference over general creditors, upon the statement of facts contained in the pleadings.

The question is between the general depositors of the Ohio Savings Bank &i Trust Company and the defendants in error.

The general depositors in effect claim that the bank in question was merely a collector of rents, and that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McDonald, Admr. v. FultonOhio Supreme Court · 1932
  2. State Ex Rel. Toledo Theatres & Realty Co. v. FultonOhio Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Squire v. American Express Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Crosley v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1966
  3. Luper v. Action Industries, Inc. (In re Lee Way Holding Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1990
  4. Branciforti v. Ninety-Eighth, Realty Co.Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1934
  5. Crosley v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API