Legal Opinion

Rhodes Western v. Clarke

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 18, 1971No. 1 CA-CIV 1125PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEVENS, Presiding Judge.

The plaintiff, Madolyn Clarke, secured a default judgment against Rhodes Western, one of two defendants in a tort action. Rhodes Western sought to have the trial court vacate both the default judgment and the entry of the default, or in the alternative, to vacate the default judgment. The relief sought in the trial court was denied. On this appeal Rhodes Western seeks the same alternative relief.

In her complaint, the plaintiff joined two defendants, Rhodes Western, a foreign corporation, and Maxim’s of Oregon, Inc., a foreign corporation. The latter will be referred…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Camacho v. GardnerArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Lawrence v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  3. Wellton-Mohawk Irrigation & Drainage District v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  4. Camacho v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  5. C. Meisel Music Company v. PerlCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ward v. Cook United, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Mayhew v. McDougallCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  3. Adams v. Para-Chem Southern, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Hawke v. BellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API