Legal Opinion

C. Meisel Music Company v. Perl

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 23, 1966No. 1 CA-CIV 229PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the lower court granting a motion filed pursuant to Rule 60(c), (5) and (6), of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S., relieving the defendant Leidhaber from the provisions of a default judgment obtained against him by plaintiff Meisel Music Company.

We are called upon to determine whether the uncontroverted facts as indicated by the affidavits on file are sufficient to authorize the trial court to relieve the defendant Leidhaber from the operation of the judgment.

The facts necessary for a determination of this matter are as follows: In…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sophie Radack and Charles Radack v. Norwegian America Line Agency, Inc., and Den Norske Amerikalinje, A/sCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  2. Coconino Pulp and Paper Company v. MarvinArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Bateman v. McDonaldArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Marquez v. Rapid Harvest Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Di Pietruntonio v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Leahy v. RyanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  2. State v. SwingleArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Arnold v. Van OrnumCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  4. Hanen v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  5. Rhodes Western v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API