Camacho v. Gardner
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
MOLLOY, Judge.
This appeal questions the propriety of •the trial court’s setting aside an entry of the defendants’ default and the $50,000 judgment for the plaintiff which had been •entered on the default.
Since the trial court granted the defendants’ motion, our function on appeal is to examine the affidavits submitted in support of and in opposition to the motion to set aside default and default judgment in the strongest light possible in favor of the defendants, prevailing parties below. Thomas v. Goettl Bros. Metal Products, 76 Ariz. 54, 57, 258 P.2d 816 (1953). Accordingly, the facts as…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Elfman v. Evanston Bus Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1963
- Coconino Pulp and Paper Company v. MarvinArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- Stallcup v. RathbunArizona Supreme Court · 1953
- Bateman v. McDonaldArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Marquez v. Rapid Harvest Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1965
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Camacho v. GardnerArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Mayhew v. McDougallCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
- Armstrong v. City Court of ScottsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Camacho v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Hawke v. BellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.