Legal Opinion
Concord Auto Auction, Inc. v. Rustin
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided February 13, 1986No. Civ. A. 84-3659-YPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOUNG, District Judge.
Close corporations, Concord Auto Auction, Inc. (“Concord”) and E.L. Cox Associates, Inc. (“Associates”) brought this action for the specific performance of a stock purchase and restriction agreement (the “Agreement”). Concord and Associates allege that Lawrence H. Rustin (“Rustin”) as the administrator of E.L. Cox’s estate (“Cox”) failed to effect the repurchase of Cox’s stock holdings as provided by the Agreement. The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1332(a)(1) because Rustin, a Connecticut citizen, is properly diverse to Concord and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Robert C. Hahn v. Francis W. SargentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Robert Industries, Inc. v. SpenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Over the Road Drivers, Inc. v. Transport Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- CIM Ins. Corp. v. Midpac Auto Center, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2000
- Evangelista v. HollandMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
- Pacheco v. Cambridge Technology Partners (Massachusetts), Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
- Thompson v. Daluise (In Re Wet-Jet International, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
- Cataldo v. Continental Insurance Co. (In re Data Concepts International, Inc.)District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1987