Legal Opinion
Pacheco v. Cambridge Technology Partners (Massachusetts), Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 1, 2000No. CIV. A. 98-12374-WGYPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOUNG, Chief Judge.
I. Introduction
This case arises out of a stock for stock merger (the “Merger”) between Cambridge Technology Partners (Massachusetts), Inc. (“Cambridge”) and Excell Data Corporation (“Excell”), which closed on August 31, 1998 (the “Closing Date”). After a post-closing drop in the price of Cambridge stock, certain former Excell shareholders, including the plaintiff Leonard J. Pacheco (collectively, “Pacheco”) sued, asserting claims against Cambridge for violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and for breach of…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Shaw v. Digital Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- San Leandro Emergency Medical Group Profit Sharing Plan v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Glassman v. Computervision Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,272, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5268, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8535 in Re Stac Electronics Securities Litigation. Timothy J. Anderson Neil Singer Arthur Singer, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Gary W. Clow Douglas Whiting Robert Johnson Alex Brown & Sons Incorporated Lawrence FinchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Securities Litigation BMC Software, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2001
- Carney v. Cambridge Technology Partners, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Van Ormer v. Aspen Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000