Legal Opinion

Holbrook & Co. v. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 5, 1901PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Certiorari. Before Judge Lumpkin. Eulton superior court. March term, 1900.

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, P. J.

The record discloses that A. L. Holbrook & Company instituted against the Evansville and Terre Haute Railroad Company a garnishment proceeding with a view to requiring it to answer what it was indebted to one Sams. This proceeding was based upon an alleged justice’s court judgment in favor of Holbrook & Co. against him. The papers were placed in the hands of M. E. Barnes, a constable, who made the following return of service: “ Served summons of garnishment upon the within affi-

davit and bond on Evansville & Terre Haute R. R. Co., by serving *2L. R. Sams, sole agent of the Co., in charge of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Third National Bank v. McCullough Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Jones v. Bibb Brick Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Atwood v. TuckerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Dent v. DentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Robinson v. Bryson & SonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  5. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. Peoples BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API