Legal Opinion

Phillips v. H. K. Thurber & Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 15, 1876PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Garnishment. Jurisdiction. Evidence. Before Judge Hopkins. Fulton Superior Court. October Term, 1874. Reported in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Bleckley, Judge.

After the service of summons of garnishment, a stranger came in, under the act of 1871, (Code, section 3541,) and, as claimant of the fund-sought to be reached by the garnishment, filed his bond in substantial compliance with the act. Subsequently the garnishee answered, admitting himself indebted in a specific sum to the defendant in the suit wherein the garnishment issued. The claimant traversed the answer. He also filed a plea to the jurisdiction of the court on the ground that the garnishee was not a resident of the county but of another county. The defendant in the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harvey v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Warlick v. Neal Loan & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Allen v. Atlanta Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  4. Southern Pacific Co. v. Davison-Paxon Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  5. Hercules Powder Co. v. RhodenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API