Phillips v. H. K. Thurber & Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Garnishment. Jurisdiction. Evidence. Before Judge Hopkins. Fulton Superior Court. October Term, 1874. Reported in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Bleckley, Judge.
After the service of summons of garnishment, a stranger came in, under the act of 1871, (Code, section 3541,) and, as claimant of the fund-sought to be reached by the garnishment, filed his bond in substantial compliance with the act. Subsequently the garnishee answered, admitting himself indebted in a specific sum to the defendant in the suit wherein the garnishment issued. The claimant traversed the answer. He also filed a plea to the jurisdiction of the court on the ground that the garnishee was not a resident of the county but of another county. The defendant in the…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Harvey v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Warlick v. Neal Loan & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Allen v. Atlanta Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Davison-Paxon Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Hercules Powder Co. v. RhodenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925