State v. Rochelle
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
— Defendant John Michael Rochelle, Jr., waived jury trial and was convicted of negligent homicide. Rochelle’s principal contention on appeal presents a question of first impression. Does the refusal of a chemical breath test by one arrested for drunken driving prevent the State from! introducing evidence of his blood alcohol content obtained by a urinalysis? We hold that it does not and affirm.
The State charged that, while under the influence of alcohol and narcotic drugs, Rochelle recklessly drove his automobile and caused an intersection collision. A passenger in the other vehicle was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Washington Natural Gas Co. v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1969
- Department of Revenue v. HoppeWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- Knowles v. HollyWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. RoadhsWashington Supreme Court · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Robinson v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Robinson v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Public Disclosure Commission v. RainsWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. MendozaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.