Legal Opinion

Geiger v. Dowdy

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 19, 1933No. Appeals 276, 277 and 278PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

Actions in trespass to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile collision were instituted by Amy R., Emily G-., and Mary E. Geiger against James H. Dowdy and the Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania. That company has appealed from judgments entered on verdicts for each of the plaintiffs, and the refusal of the lower court to enter a judgment for the defendant is the subject of the sole assignment of error in each case. The cases were tried together'and will be disposed of in one opinion.

As the controversy involves the sufficiency of the evidence…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clamper v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McKee v. Jamestown Baking Co., Inc. (Burns, Third Party Defendant)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  2. Wertz v. ShadeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Fitzpatrick v. Pralon Cleaners & DyersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Blaskey v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Kolb v. IsenbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API