Legal Opinion

Fitzpatrick v. Pralon Cleaners & Dyers

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 10, 1937No. Appeal, 85PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Pabkeb, J.,

The plaintiff has a judgment against the original defendant in an action in trespass for damages to plaintiff’s car resulting from a collision with a truck belonging to that defendant at a street intersection. The defendant has appealed and complains of the refusal of his motion for judgment n. o. v. He contends that the court below should have declared as a matter of law that the driver of defendant’s car was not negligent and that the driver of plaintiff’s car was guilty of contributory negligence.

We will, as we are required to, review the evidence in a light most…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Guilinger v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Wolf v. SpencerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Johnson v. American Reduction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Schoepp v. GeretySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  5. Hatch v. RobinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Miles v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Carl v. KurtzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Eisenhower v. Hall's Motor Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Katz v. MontagueSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Benn v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API