Legal Opinion

Clamper v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 11, 1924No. Appeal, No. 138PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Frazer,

A subsidence, or sinking, occurred in a portion of the roadway of Euclid Avenue, in the City of Philadelphia, leaving a depression about two feet square, over which the city placed a small box on which it maintained a red light at night. Although the sunken part was pear the *387curb the city authorities evidently considered the entire street at that point dangerous and attempted to exclude traffic by stretching a rope from curb to curb at a distance of about twenty-five feet from each side of the defective roadway and at a height estimated as from four to six feet…

2Cited by25 opinions

  1. Rader v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Simrell Et Ux. v. EschenbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. McKee v. Jamestown Baking Co., Inc. (Burns, Third Party Defendant)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  4. Lane v. E. A. Mullen, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Salvitti v. ThroppeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API