Legal Opinion

Hammond v. McCollough

California Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1911No. L.A. No. 2324PublishedCited by 26 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

In case numbered 52998, W. T. S. Hammond, administrator of the estate of Merrill A. Weir, deceased, brought action against A. M. F. McCollough, administrator of the estate of Nancy A. Weir, deceased (wife of Merrill A. Weir), to quiet title to real property situated in the city of Los Angeles, claimed by plaintiff administrator to be a part of the estate of his intestate and by the defendant administrator to be a part of the estate of his intestate. In case numbered 52999, the action was between the same'parties to recover possession of certain personal property under the same contention of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fanning v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Freese v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Frink v. RoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Kenney v. ParksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Mowry v. HeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Huber v. HuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Socol v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Bias v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Stafford v. MartinoniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API