Legal Opinion

Saft v. Upper Dublin Township

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 30, 1993No. 2585 and 2586 C.D. 1992PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Arthur Saft, Phyllis Saft, C. Carter Bond, III, and Jacquelyn K. Bond (collectively, Appellants) appeal from the October 26, 1992 order of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County granting a motion in limine in the nature of a motion for summary judgment filed by Upper Dublin Township, its commissioners, and employees (Township). 1 The broad question presented for this Court’s review is whether the governmental immunity provisions contained in the Judicial Code, 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 8541-8564, immunize the Township from liability resulting from the Township’s alleged failure to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Gibson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Bell v. Koppers Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Stein v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Burman v. Golay and Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Schendt v. DeweyNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Banic v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Rizzo v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Jones v. ChieffoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Association of PA State Colleges and University Faculties v. PASSHECommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API