Legal Opinion

Schendt v. Dewey

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1994No. S-92-1007, S-92-1008PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Per curiam

Cindy Schendt filed a personal injury action against Dr. John L. Dewey, alleging negligence and fraudulent concealment. Dewey demurred, alleging that the claim was barred by the statute of limitations. The district court sustained the demurrer and dismissed the action. Schendt appeals. Linder our authority to regulate the caseloads of the appellate courts of this state, we removed the matter to this court.

When considering a demurrer to a petition, a court must assume the pleaded facts, as opposed to legal conclusions, are true as alleged and must give the petition the benefit of any…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Lott v. HaleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  3. In Re Certified QuestionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Mega v. Holy Cross HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Prendergast v. NelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1977

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Methodist Healthcare System of San Antonio, Ltd., L.L.P., W.C. Schorlemer, M.D., and Robert Schorlemer, M.D. v. Emmalene RankinTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Green v. Siegel, Barnett & SchutzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Weston v. McWilliams & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  4. Manker v. MankerNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Bruske v. HilleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API