People v. Holmes
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.
The appellant was charged by information with having committed the crime of rape in violation of the provisions of subdivisions 3 and á of section 261 of the Penal Code, and was also charged jointly with one Tetta Ratiate with having contributed to the delinquency of a girl under the age of twenty-one years. Both defendants were convicted by a jury, and this appeal is taken from the judgment and order denying a motion for new trial upon the charge of rape.
The portions of said section which are relied upon by respondent read as follows:
“Rape is an act of sexual intercourse, accompanied with a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. BonzaniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. GoldsmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933