Legal Opinion

People v. Holmes

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 1925No. Docket No. 1156PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

The appellant was charged by information with having committed the crime of rape in violation of the provisions of subdivisions 3 and á of section 261 of the Penal Code, and was also charged jointly with one Tetta Ratiate with having contributed to the delinquency of a girl under the age of twenty-one years. Both defendants were convicted by a jury, and this appeal is taken from the judgment and order denying a motion for new trial upon the charge of rape.

The portions of said section which are relied upon by respondent read as follows:

“Rape is an act of sexual intercourse, accompanied with a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. BonzaniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. GoldsmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API