White v. Department of Labor & Industries
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
The question presented on this appeal is whether the essence of a particular independent contract is the personal labor of the independent contractors, within the purview of the Laws of 1937, chapter 211, § 2, p. 1030 (Rem. Rev. Stat. (Sup.), § 7674-1 [cf. RCW 51.08.180, part]).
The exact wording of that section of our workmen’s compensation act is as follows:
“The term workman within the contemplation of this act means every person in this state who is engaged in the employment of or who is working under an independent contract, the essence of which is his personal labor for any employer…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Burchett v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Johnson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Norman v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Haller v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Latimer v. Western MacHinery ExchangeWashington Supreme Court · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Lloyd's of Yakima Floor Center v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- Department of Labor & Industries v. Lyons Enterprises, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
- Malang v. DEPARTMENT OF L&ICourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Malang v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Dana's Housekeeping, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.