Legal Opinion

Hammerschmith v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1934No. 24883. Department TwoPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Geraghty, J. —

Frank N. Hammerschmith, while engaged in a logging operation, sustained an injury, for which he filed a claim for compensation with the department of labor and industries. After investigation by the department and an appeal to the joint board, the board rejected the claim, on the ground that claimant was not a workman, but an independent contractor. The claimant appealed to the superior court of Thurs-ton county, where the order of the joint board was sustained. This appeal follows.

There is little dispute here on questions of fact. The issue is dependent upon the legal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burchett v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Machenheimer v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Haller v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Hubbard v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Lindbloom v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Erickson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Vance v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API