Legal Opinion

State v. Payne

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 26, 1995No. 12993PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of risk of iryury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-211 and of misdemeanor coercion in violation of General Statutes § 53a-192.2 On appeal, the defendant claims *3that the trial court (1) improperly denied his motions for judgment of acquittal and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the charge of risk of injury to a child because § 53-21, as applied to the facts of this case, is unconstitutionally vague and indefinite, (2) incorrectly instructed the jury on the elements of § 53-21, (3)…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. State v. SinclairSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. State v. KulmacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. State v. FlemingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  4. State v. PickeringSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. State v. CooperSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. State v. CardwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. State v. CharlesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  4. Meyers v. Cornwell Quality Tools, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  5. State v. EastwoodConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API