Legal Opinion
State v. Charles
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 22, 2003No. AC 21771PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
The defendant, Benjamin Charles III, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of criminal violation of a protective order in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1999) § 53a-110b, now § 53a-223.1 On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the court violated his due process rights by failing to charge the jury that intent was a necessary element of the crime of violating a protective order, (2) as applied to him, § 53a-110b, now § 53a-223, is unconstitutionally vague in that it fails to provide notice that inadvertent contact could form the basis…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Zapata v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. FaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. T.R.D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. TRDSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. BrowneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. ColemanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.