Legal Opinion
Reebok International Ltd. v. Marnatech Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 28, 1989No. Civ. A. 89-1361-GT (CM)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
GORDON THOMPSON, Jr., Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs, Reebok International Ltd. and Reebok International Limited, originally moved ex parte on September 12, 1989, for a temporary restraining order, seizure order and order to show cause for a preliminary injunction under the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. § 1051, et seq.), as amended by the Trademark Counterfeiting Act of 1984, Public Law 98-473, and the laws of the State of California, for the reason that defendants appear to be selling and dealing in footwear bearing counterfeits of plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Steele v. Bulova Watch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Apple Computer, Inc. v. Formula International Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- First Brands Corporation v. Fred Meyer, Inc. And Basf Wyandotte CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Timberlane Lumber Co. v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Sardi's Restaurant Corporation, Sardi's Restaurant Services, Inc., and Vincent Sardi v. Lyle Sardie and Western Pubs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ocean Garden, Inc., Plaintiff-Counterdefendant-Appellee v. Marktrade Company, Inc. Alberto J. Soler, Defendants-Counterclaimants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Gucci America, Inc. v. Guess?, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Aurora World, Inc. v. Ty Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Reebok International, Ltd. v. Marnatech Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Reebok International Ltd. v. SebelenDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.