Halliburton Oil Producing Co. v. Grothaus
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtOpala, J.
¶ 1 The dispositive issue on certiorari is whether the money held by Kerr-McGee Corporation is impressed with immunity from liability because it represents gas runs from restricted Indian land 1 — i.e. produc tion that occurred after restoration of the land’s restricted status. Because we cannot tell on this record whether garnishment-impressed funds are proceeds from pre- or post-restoration gas runs (runs that preceded or succeeded the land’s restoration to restricted status), the trial court’s post-deficiency payover order is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings to be…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Carpenter v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Neil Acquisition, L.L.C. v. Wingrod Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Frey v. Independence Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Cate v. Archon Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Horizons, Inc. v. Keo Leasing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Booth v. McKnightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- House of Realty, Inc. v. City of Midwest CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Skinner v. John Deere Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Walker v. Group Health Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Bank of Oklahoma, N.A. v. Red Arrow Marina Sales & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.