Legal Opinion

Ellinwood v. McCoy

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 3, 1933No. Docket No. 9171PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

From the several statements of fact contained in the record herein, it is assumed by this court that the pertinent and essential conditions which appertain to the application herein are substantially that in an action pending in the superior court between the parties hereto the plaintiff therein recovered judgment for a substantial amount; that thereupon the defendant gave notice of appeal and, in accordance with the provisions of the statute with reference thereto, for the purpose of staying execution of the judgment pending such appeal, filed an undertaking which was executed by a regularly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nonpareil Manufacturing Co. v. McCartneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Segarini v. BargagliottiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Foster v. FernandesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kim v. ChinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Oliver Aresti v. SotoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1940
  3. Dunham v. Cantlay & Tanzola, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Isaak v. EvidonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Oliver Aresti v. SotoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API