Legal Opinion

Isaak v. Evidon

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 29, 1961No. Civ. 25947PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FRAMPTON, J. pro tem. *

Petitioner seeks to restrain plaintiff and cross-defendants from enforcing the judgment below pending disposition of his appeal therefrom upon condition that within 30 days from date of notice of order granting supersedeas he will either justify his undertaking on appeal, make cash deposit or file a corporate undertaking in the manner prescribed by law.

Petitioner is the defendant and cross-complainant in an action in the superior court in which a judgment in favor of plaintiff was rendered against him on September 14, 1961, in the sum of $15,000 with interest from…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hill v. FinniganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Nonpareil Manufacturing Co. v. McCartneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Segarini v. BargagliottiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Rosenfeld v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Tompkins v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Belle Vista Investment Co. v. HassenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API