Legal Opinion

Comerica Bank v. Cohen

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 2010No. Docket No. 293327PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant, Walter Cohen, appeals as of right a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff, Comerica Bank, in this contract dispute. On appeal, defendant challenges the circuit court’s order granting plaintiffs motion for summary disposition plaintiff. We affirm.

I. FACTS

As noted in the preceding paragraph, this is a contract dispute. On August 1, 2006, plaintiff and 21 Century Arizona Monteil LLC, entered into a loan agreement. The agreement specified that defendant, manager of 21 Century, was the guarantor. The agreement further specified that the term “loan” referred to “an equity loan in the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Allison v. AEW CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLPMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Peterson Novelties, Inc v. City of BerkleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Meagher v. Wayne State UniversityMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Corley v. Detroit Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Latham v. Barton Malow Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Calhoun County v. Blue Cross Blue ShieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Van Rooyen v. Greystone Home Builders, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2018
  3. 31800 Wick Road Holdings, LLC v. Future Lodging-Airport, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012
  4. Beckett-Buffum Agency, Inc. v. Allied Property & Casualty InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Marketplace of Rochester Hills v. Comerica BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API