Legal Opinion

Hamman v. Miller

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 12, 1914PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Shenandoah county in a proceeding to ascertain a boundary under act of March 4, 1912. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.

This proceeding was instituted by the defendant in error against the plaintiffs in error and others to fix a disputed boundary line between the lands owned by the parties respectively under the provisions of an act of the legislature entitled, “An act to authorize the ascertainment and designation of the boundary lines of real estate,” approved March 4, 1912. Acts of 1912, pp. 133-4.

Upon a hearing of the cause a jury was waived and all matters of law and fact were submitted to the court -for its decision, and a judgment was entered establishing the fine ascertained by it to be the true…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reusens v. LawsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  2. Overton's heirs v. DavissonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1844
  3. Martin's Administrator v. Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac RailroadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903
  4. Gray v. RumrillSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Christian v. BulbeckSupreme Court of Virginia · 1916
  2. Bangor-Punta Operations, Inc. v. Atlantic Leasing, Ltd.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1974
  3. Wade v. FordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1952
  4. Wright v. RabeySupreme Court of Virginia · 1915
  5. Hilliard v. Union Trust Co. of New JerseySupreme Court of Virginia · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API