Legal Opinion

Martin's Administrator v. Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 11, 1903PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to a judgment of tlie Circuit Court of Stafford county, rendered May 5, 1902, in an action of trespass on the case, . wherein the plaintiff in error was the plaintiff, and the defendant in error was the defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.

Upon the first trial of this cause there was a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, which was set aside upon motion of the defendant, and a new trial granted. Upon the second trial, all matters of law and fact having been submitted to the court, it gave judgment for the defendant. To that judgment this writ of error was awarded.

The action of the court setting aside the verdict of the jury upon the first trial is assigned as error.

One of the material questions in the case was whether or not the defendant’s train gave any warning of its approach to the public crossing where it ran into the…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rogers v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
  2. Hoster-Columbus Associated Breweries Co. v. Stag Hotel Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1910
  3. James River & Kanawha Power Co v. Old Dominion Iron & Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  4. Brammer's Administrator v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1905
  5. Clere v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API