Legal Opinion

Hilliard v. Union Trust Co. of New Jersey

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 14, 1918Published

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Rockingham county, in an action of debt and in attachment proceedings ancillary thereto. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants assign- error.

1Opinion of the Court

Whittle, P.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The attachment in this case was ancillary to an action of debt instituted in the Circuit Court of Rockingham county by one of the defendants in error, the Union Trust Company of New Jersey, a corporation, against plaintiff *726in error, Ann P.. Hilliard, and William C. T. Hilliard, for the recovery of $1,018.39, with interest and costs, due upon a foreign judgment. Neither the validity of the debt nor the attachment is controverted. And many of the assignments of error contained in the. petition for a writ of error need not be noticed, since they do…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Martin's Administrator v. Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac RailroadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903
  2. Richardson v. J. S. Hoskins Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1911
  3. Gray v. RumrillSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903
  4. Hamman v. MillerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API