Fudala v. Leedom
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DOWLING, Judge:
Appellant sought damages for injuries sustained in an automobile accident. He felt the jury’s award was too little and appeals to this court for a new trial limited to damages only. The main support for his claim of inadequacy is a personal colloquy engaged in by the trial court following the examination of one of the medical witnesses.
There was no real controversy as to liability; the critical issue being the extent of appellant’s injuries. Appellant *324sustained a fractured clavical, multiple right side rib fractures, a severely sprained wrist and a pneumothorax resulting when…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. MymaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Commonwealth v. SafisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- D'Allura v. PerriSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- McKown v. Demmler Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harman Ex Rel. Harman v. BorahSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- HARMAN ON BEHALF OF HARMAN v. BorahSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Factor v. FactorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Com. v. Manzoor, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Harman Ex Rel. Harman v. BorahSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000