Legal Opinion
Fragoso v. Fell
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided May 10, 2005No. 2 CA-SA 2005-0001Published
1Opinion of the Court
111 P.3d 1027 (2005)
210 Ariz. 427
Rene Antonio FRAGOSO, Petitioner,
v.
Hon. Howard FELL, Judge Pro Tempore of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in and for the County of Pima, Respondent, and
The State of Arizona, Real Party in Interest.
No. 2 CA-SA 2005-0001.
Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department B.
May 10, 2005.
Law Office of Cornelia Wallis Honchar, By Cornelia Wallis Honchar, Tucson, for Petitioner.
Barbara LaWall, Pima County Attorney, By Taren M. Ellis, Tucson, for Real Party in Interest.
OPINION
PELANDER, Chief Judge.
¶ 1 In this special action proceeding, petitioner Rene…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Bradley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Westerman v. CaryWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Fragoso v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Jett v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.