Legal Opinion
David Cox v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 1, 1989No. 87-2856PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Per curiam
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Plaintiff-appellant appeals the district court’s entry of judgment in favor of the United States on November 30, 1987, after directing a verdict in its favor on November 16, 1987.
Plaintiff sued the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346, 2671-2680, for injuries he sustained when he struck…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Michael Mandel v. United States of America and Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- David L. Klepper v. City of Milford, Kansas, and David L. Klepper v. United States of America, & Third Party and City of Milford, Kansas, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Ewell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- John Proud, Individually and as Next Friend of Heather Proud, a Minor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Rodger L. O'neal, Theresa O'Neal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hill v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Gene S. Jacobsen, and Cross-Appellee v. Deseret Book Company, a Utah Corporation Dean Hughes, AndCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Hughey v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Coffey v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
- Leslie Dewayne Yarrington v. Steven J. Davies, Secretary of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.