Legal Opinion
Clarke v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 14, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2010-1083PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying the Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment and the plaintiffs motion for sanctions. The pro se plaintiff brings suit against the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”), alleging that he was the victim of unlawful discrimination on the basis of his race and gender. Because the plaintiff fails to cast any doubt upon WMATA’s legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for firing…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Brady v. Office of the Sergeant at ArmsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Dudley v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Montgomery v. RisenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Clemmons v. Academy for Educational Development, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Lane v. VasquezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Keepseagle v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.