Legal Opinion

State v. Hurd

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1940No. 28002PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

Upon a trial before a jury, defendant was convicted of the crime of operating a motor ve- Riele “while under the influence of, or affected by, intoxicating liquor,” and from the judgment of conviction he now appeals.

The facts material to the questions raised upon the appeal are as follows: On January 3, 1939, an information was filed, charging appellant with the crime of operating a motor vehicle “while under the influence of intoxicating liquor.” Appellant was arraigned on that charge and pleaded “not guilty.” After a mistrial in November, 1939, the trial court, on February 10, 1940, granted…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Garland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. State v. SisnerosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  3. People v. O'HaraMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. State of Arizona v. DuguidArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Luellen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. In Re the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of SantoreCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. ConnollyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Polillo v. DeaneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  4. State v. McDanielsWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  5. State v. HansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API