Schroeder v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
The judgment in this ease cannot be sustained without overruling Temperani v. United States (C. C. A.) 299 F. 365, and Bell v. United States (C. C. A.) 9 F.(2d) 820. Adhering as we do to the views there expressed, the judgment in this case must be reversed.
To uphold an entry and search such as was here made is to entirely ignore “a necessary difference between a search of a store, dwelling house, or other structure in respect of which a proper official warrant readily may be obtained and a search of a ship, motorboat, wagon, or automobile for contraband goods, where it…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Temperani v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
- Bell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
3Cited by8 opinions
- Papani v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- United States v. Di CorvoDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1927
- United States v. LorenzDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1927
- United States v. SwanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1926
- Cola v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.