United States v. Di Corvo

THOMAS, District Judge.

After hearing had on the motions to exclude and suppress evidence and to return seized property, testimony was taken in support of the allegations of fact set forth in the petition. Before proceeding with a,discussion of the law applicable to the case, it is important to first state the facts found from the evidence.

On November 12, 1926, certain prohibition agents came upon a building located on what is known as the “Nesbit Harm” in Clintonville, and there seized certain, stills, drums of alcohol, and other paraphernalia used in the distillation of alcohol, and…