Legal Opinion

United States v. Lorenz

District Court, D. Montana

Decided February 26, 1927No. Nos. 1612, 1620, 1645PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOURQUIN, District Judge.

These are motions for new trials. The defendants were convicted and sentenced for violations of the Prohibition Act (Comp. St. § 1013814 et seq.). They moved to suppress evidence and objected to its introduction, on the ground that it had been obtained by unlawful search and seizure, contrary to their rights secured by the federal Constitution.

In Lorenz’s Case, the evidence is that a prohibition agent and police, on information and without warrants, approached certain premises ostensibly fitted as a dwelling house; that the odor of mash and intoxicating liquor was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Temperani v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
  2. Koth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
  3. Vaught v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
  4. Bell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
  5. Schroeder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. ShultzDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1933
  2. In re HerterDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1929
  3. Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
  4. Kevin Wilson v. Heather Shirley, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2025
  5. Michael Corey Slaughter v. Tammy L. Campbell, Warden, California State Prison - CorcoranDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API