Legal Opinion
2101 Wisconsin Associates v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 20, 1991No. 89-1134PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge:
Petitioner, an employer, challenges an award of unemployment compensation on the grounds that the appeals examiner improperly restricted cross-examination of the claimant-employee and also failed to make written findings of fact with respect to material contested issues. We conclude that the first claim of error provides no basis for disturbing the administrative decision, but that the second has merit; we therefore vacate the decision and remand to the agency for more specific findings of fact.
I
Claimant Pauline Thompson was dismissed from her job as a reservations…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Perkins v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Jadallah v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Hickenbottom v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Colton v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kennedy v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Mendelson v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Townsend v. DonaldsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Gilmore v. ATLANTIC SERVICES GROUPDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Environmental Ass'n of St. Thomas-St. John v. Virgin Islands Board of Land Use AppealsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.