Legal Opinion

Reed v. Horn's Motor Express, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 11, 1936No. Appeals, 9 and 10PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

These actions in trespass were brought by Orval T. Reed, owner and driver of a Dodge coach, and by Wm. R. Newcomer, a passenger in that coach, to recover damages for injuries received as a result of a collision of the coach with a large truck alleged to have been owned by defendant and at the time operated in defendant’s business.'

The two actions were tried together and plaintiffs have verdicts of a jury. On this appeal complaint is made of the refusal of defendant’s motion for a new trial and for judgment n. o. v. We are all of the opinion that the court below correctly…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hartig v. American Ice Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Holzheimer v. Lit Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Neely v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Readshaw Et Ux. v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Ferry v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harbridge Et Ux. v. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Midora v. Alfieri (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Del Gaizo Distributing Corp. v. GallagherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Jensen v. Bell Telephone Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1937
  5. Walker v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API