Legal Opinion

Del Gaizo Distributing Corp. v. Gallagher

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 12, 1936No. Appeal, 125PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

James, J.,

This is an action of assumpsit to recover the value of 35 cases of tomato paste stored by plaintiff in defendant’s warehouse, which defendant refused to deliver upon demand. At the trial the court gave binding instructions for defendant and later refused plaintiff’s motion for judgment n. o. v., or a new trial.

The agreed statement of facts, in lieu of printing the record, is substantially as follows: On September 30, 1933, defendant issued and delivered to plaintiff two warehouse receipts for a total of 600 cases, and on October 2, 1933, four warehouse receipts for a total…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Epps v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Davis v. Van Camp Packing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  3. Neely v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Commonwealth v. GoodmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  5. Miller v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1882

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BolgerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Tuschman v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  3. Walker Bank & Trust Co. v. New York Terminal W. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Young v. Aetna Life Ins.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Tuschman v. Pennsylvania RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API