Legal Opinion
Yax v. Yax
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 9, 1925PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hinkley, J.:
The first above-entitled action asks for partition of a house and lot in Chelsea place in the city of Buffalo. The second above-*852entitled action is brought to declare its plaintiff, Albert C. Yax, the sole owner of the said real estate. The two actions, upon stipulation, were jointly tried at a regular Equity Term of this court, as they presented the one issue for the court to determine, to wit: Is Margaret H. Yax an equal tenant in common with Albert C. Yax of the said real estate or is Albert C. Yax the sole owner or entitled to the entire proceeds?
Upon the trial Albert C. Yax,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stelz v. . ShreckNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Haviland v. . WilletsNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Warner v. Press Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Bell v. LittleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Perrin v. HarringtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hosford v. HosfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Poppe v. PoppeNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Secrist v. SecristAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Armondi v. DunhamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Asker v. AskerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.