Armondi v. Dunham
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
The action is for partition. There is no dispute in the facts. It is conceded that Fred W. Livingston and Edith N. Livingston were husband and wife; that on the 10th day of April, 1900, the real property in question was conveyed to them, and that they resided upon and occupied the premises until the death of the wife, September 26, 1903. Thereafter the husband as survivor conveyed the premises to one Barrett, and the defendants now hold title through mesne conveyances from him.
The plaintiff claims title to an undivided one-half of said premises as tenant in common through conveyances made by…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bertles v. . NunanNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Stelz v. . ShreckNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- In Re the Final Accounting of Executors of AlbrechtNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- In Re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of KlatzlNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Perrin v. HarringtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- V.R.W., Inc. v. KleinNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Coleman v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- In re CorriganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- In re the Estate of SitkinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
- Huber v. HuberNew York Supreme Court · 1960
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.