Legal Opinion

Bell v. Little

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 22, 1922PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sears, J.:

Plaintiff seeks in this action admeasurement of dower in certain premises of which James Bell was seized at the time of his death. The answering defendants, who are heirs at law of James Bell, challenge the plaintiff’s claim of dower on the ground that the plaintiff was not the lawful wife of James Bell.

*236In 1904 the plaintiff married one Kelsey in this State and lived with him in Rochester until May, 1912, when she abandoned her husband and went to the State of Pennsylvania for the sole purpose of obtaining a judgment of divorce from Kelsey in the courts of that State. She instituted…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Maynard v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Van Voorhis v. . BrintnallNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  4. Starbuck v. . StarbuckNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. Cunningham v. . CunninghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Krause v. KrauseNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. V.R.W., Inc. v. KleinNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Mitchell v. FrederickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  4. Hamm v. HammCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
  5. Secrist v. SecristAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API